one point, the entire Confederation agreed that integration is good. This should probably be in the first place because each integration defined according to his personal discretion and its end in itself.
Swiss Television for example, used the word integration tonight as a justification for the fee payers with learning disabilities agonizing 45 minutes to demonstrate six people. Yes, perform, do not imagine, because these people were not portrayed with the necessary sensitivity and respect with which you should treat every human being. Instead, they have been caricatured.
We saw Remo, the "little boy" who has everything what a vagina and breasts anbaggert and always has a big mouth. Not Remo, a grown man who is lonely because of his disability has trouble finding a partner and therefore struggling for attention.
We saw a gentleman who appeared to be happy painting and, as you notice when, despite the superficial Verwurstelung his person by the camera team to some extent, is a sensitive, thoughtful person to whom it would have been worthwhile to look more closely to deal with it. It would probably become clear to the viewer that this is neither a "Mongo," nor a "Büebli hearted", but a person with deep thoughts and emotions.
Under normal circumstances, would probably almost everyone who has done this scrap can really feel my criticism. But the Swiss television has made provisions so and gave itself the integration absolution. And lo and behold, it works. As with the introduction of the index finger in the neck to the people shoot the vomit from his mouth, then shoots them with "integration" good "integration well, I for it," out of that. Just as the former nausea, makes this "integration charm" itself remains critical thinking people do not stop often.
The same with Paradrom Rathausen-Lucerne: a freak show for the amusement of the mob that make the daily effort, the disabled people in coping with their everyday life, for the fun event and disfigured so ridiculous moves. Quick the Alibi-phrase: "We do that on integration ausgespiehen and you can already own a Bruderer Pascale Wyss, which is itself grown up with deaf people and know better would have to win the sponsorship committee. Tragic. 
Or, I also always like to bring that ESPAS Foundation, which praised in one of their brochures a few years ago "integrative jobs" and said so what? Sheltered employment for the disabled in their ghetto. Here the same meeting point between two brainless, which are then also linked to heavy-handed way: The common principle of social "integration well." meets "good work." But on the Protestant faith. And because "integration work well and good" results from it then, logically, "Work = Integration". That "work" not necessarily "free", we should all at least since the Auschwitz-Birkenau to be clear. Conclusion: The word "integration" in the disability system in my eyes long since taken over that role, which generally PR jargon terms such as "dynamic", is "transparent" or taken "sovereign": It is a brainless slogan that the silly, over-paid people advertise their conceptual Dünnpfiff and try to justify. attack
0 comments:
Post a Comment