When disabled, the SP is a kind of taboo. That's just not done. Finally, the Social Democrats, so the only politicians in this country, working for the disabled - the thinking at least many. Accordingly, I make myself with my some violent attacks against the party admittedly not particularly popular.
I would finally explain me, why I do not like the SP. I am by no means the fashionable "On-the-left-and-chop around puppets" fall trend, but have a good reason: Many SPler run social policy, environmental protection as other people.
An elected stakeholders listens to the concerns of his constituents and then tries in the relevant Councils to enforce them. The environmentalists can not. The panda can not tell him if and how he wants to be protected. This must be decided by the environmentalists themselves, unfortunately. And where he worked on with his knowledge Pushes limits, he must take recognized experts such as biologists, for help.
The Social Democrats behave in social issues quite like that. Instead of listening to the socially disadvantaged, they simply determine for themselves what is good for them and what not. However, there is a difference: the environmentalists would be ever so happy if he could tell the nature of what she needs. The Social Democrat, however, is happy when he was with the "sick poor", which he claims are so dear to deal not need. The SP ignored the disabled in this country completely, even if they still try to communicate as loudly and asks instead, prefer self-proclaimed disability experts, thanks to our discrimination earn good money at what is good for us. And these experts in turn, deliver what the Socialists want to hear: Simple black and white answers that require as little uncomfortable thinking work and confirm the Socialists in their benefactor self-image.
This mixture of self-satisfaction, convenience, and the condescending treatment of the disabled is the one who caused my anti-socialist nausea.
0 comments:
Post a Comment